A Critique of the Authors’ Argument.

Truly, in our current world, the role of language tests has been vaguely described in different contexts across different regions of the globe. The author has critically explained how the role of language tests might be overrated based on people’s expertise levels in ding other aspects of work in different sectors of the economy. This argument by the author provides an accurate picture of how things are undertaken in our current world. Based on Pearson (2021), the best professionals fail to get the jobs they deserve in different locations across the globe due to their mastery of the language. The author has credited sources used to further their argument, making the article more credible. For any scholarly article or research, it is prudent that the author credits any source of information that they have used.

The author claims that the Home office did the construction of secure English language testing to have strict measures on immigration. This is true based on the number of people that have been disqualified from getting chances to pursue careers in the United Kingdom. According to Pearson (2021), authorities tend to use mastery of English as a requirement for gaining entry into their countries as immigrants since it solves the problem of language barriers between law enforcement officers and the immigrants and prospective immigrants. The author has clearly stated this aspect with supporting evidence to back up the claims. The range of approved tests has brought divergent views over the years across the United Kingdom and the United States due to their efficiency levels.

The author has highlighted that SELTs have been used as political tools between the parties. This is accurate based on the sensationalism surrounding the entire language testing phenomenon in the United Kingdom. The conservative party can be seen to promise that it will cut down the immigration numbers from the hundreds of thousands to tens of thousands. Based on Pearson (2021), the aspect of language tests has been a tool used by the political parties in the United Kingdom to resonate well with the native population that tends to see the ballooning immigrant population as a threat to their wellbeing. This aspect has caused a strain on the technical courses and sectors in the United Kingdom because the best candidates for those positions have a problem with mastery of foreign languages like, in this case, English.

The author has further highlighted that the United Kingdom has provided fertile ground for research into the role and efficiency of language testing and immigration owing to the salience of language tests. This is an accurate picture brought by the strain highlighted above. Truly, English proficiency has been established not to measure intelligence in our current world. The system used in the United Kingdom has been established to have many limitations compared to the benefits. This is directly linked to the stagnation of some areas of the economy that are touted as the critical areas that will propel the United Kingdom to the next economic level. Throughout the article, the author has been neutral in his approach providing evidence in all the arguments. Due to this, it is clear that the article is credible, and there is little bias on the author’s side since he has looked at the issue from both sides of the spectrum.