Branching Paths: Focusing on Prevention Malaria than Curing in Sub- Saharan Africa

Malaria is one of infectious diseases in the world and caused by a female anopheles mosquitos. Despite countries directing immense resources in the fight against the menace, the disease has continued to cause ravages and to claim life especially in the sub-Saharan Africa. According to the global statistics, every year more than half a billion people contract this disease, with more than fifty percent from the sub-Saharan Africa. The disease is fatal, because out of the half a billion who get malaria, statistics reveals that over half a million succumbs to the disease. The essay has been adopted from the article wriiten by dr. Guerra, a medical officer at Medical Care Development, Maryland.

The significance of this essay is to provide evidence that will inform a paradigm shift in the fight against malaria in the sub-Saharan Africa, as in as much as programs and resources have been directed towards this fight the region is not out of the would yet, hence, the best way of conquering this menace is primarily focusing on preventing, other than providing cure when a person contracts the disease.

The world health organizations and the center for disease prevention and treatment have been very proactive and dedicated in providing multiple drugs for the treatment of malaria. It is undisputable that a good percentage of these drugs have proofed to work well, and some have significantly averted disasters and many impending deaths. However, the provision of curing drugs has not provided the solution for this disease.  In a much as this programs and treatment facilities do exist and are functional in the hospitals, unlike other place in the word where the prevalence for malaria has been on downward trend. Recent trends from sub-Saharan region have shown worrying trends as the disease has been on an upward trajectory.

Prevention strategies such as subsidizing the cost of mosquito net and offering them for free to the vulnerable and poor citizens, offering education on how people can prevent the diseases and adopting a balance diets are some strategies that government and development partners can adopt to keep the disease at bay.

This therefore justifying the famous saying that prevention is always better than cure. This is because in as much as treatment and support is given to those who are infected with the disease, the war is not warn and indeed without fear of contradiction, it is far to be warn. People have continued to succumb from the disease and therefore preventing the disease would be a sustainable and the best solution to this ravaging disease.

Justification of the Argument

There exists a couple of evidence that can indeed justify the fact that preventing malaria in the sub Saharan region is the best solution to counter this threat. It is important to look back to other places where victory has been experienced courtesy of prevention. United States is the best example that can used to justify the effectiveness of prevention approach to malaria. The world health organization has always led the fight against malaria. It rolls out programs that are all geared towards finding a sustainable solution towards diseases. For example, the famous that’s global malaria eradication program, which was rolled out in United States. This program was based on establishing strategies that would use to prevent infection n of malaria to the people of United States. The program entailed education and offering technical supports to the government and the hospitals in order to take a collective approach towards the fight of this menace and also frequently spraying the breeding sites of the mosquitoes.

This program bore significant results in United States, first it was able to significantly reduce the number of new infections by up to 50%, and therefore contracting the disease was greatly controlled. Furthermore, it helped in reducing the cost of treatment by cutting the health budget significantly, thus leaving more resources for development. (Mali et all, 2012)

How Purpose of the Argument is established

The purpose of this discussion is from a series of research that has been conducted in sub-Saharan Africa enumerating the increased concerns over the rise in malaria infection in the region. From the finding of the research it is evident that treatment approach is highly embraced and therefore with increasing cases of the disease this approach has proofed to be ineffective. Furthermore, from the center for disease prevention and control, most drugs used in treatment of malaria are highly resistance and therefore becomes ineffective after a short usage.  This therefore means that an alternative solution has to be sort and prevention is the only way to go.

Assumptions of the Author

The main assumption that the author makes in this scenario is to assume that all countries in the sub-Saharan Africa have the capacity to institutionalize prevention measures to counter the disease, which include education of people, offering mosquitos net to the vulnerable and poor households as well as regular spraying of breeding sites of the causative agent.

The assumption is important in furthering the argument as with the government having all the requisite, infrastructure and the capacity to implement this measure there is no doubt that the solution for this perennial problem will be identified, and already the measure has been piloted in other destinations and has demonstrated desirable results.

The assumption of the author is ineffective to some readers and also presents skeptics to a couple of people. This is because, countries do have different abilities and the gross domestic values of the countries are very different, therefore, in as much as the argument of preventing malaria is very incredible, it may not be realized in the short term, because some countries in the sub-Saharan Africa suffer from resources inadequacy.

Strategy Used by the Author

Logic is the most used strategy in this argument. The other approaches the issue of malaria from a logical perspective. The cost use in the treatment of malaria is far much higher than the ones used in the prevention of the disease, as according to world health organization it takes an average of $ 3.5 per year to prevent malaria against $6.25 a year to treat the disease. (Apouey & wilde, 2018) Furthermore, given that the sub-Saharan countries spend all this resources in treating malaria, the problem keeps on escalating therefore, it is logical to adopt a method that is less costly and the one that offers a sustainable solution.

The argument can be supported by the famous quote from Jim Rohn, “focus on solution not on the problem.” The quote is valid in this assertion, as it is the high time the sub-Saharan Africa and the world at large to shift the focus from treatment to prevent disease as it will save budgets and significantly reduces mortality rates. (Srinawati, W., & Alwi, R., 2020)

Conclusion

The article is incredibly significant and a good source of information to inform on policy and course of actions. It enumerates the extent of the problem, provides evidence for its arguments, and also provides mitigation strategies that is evidence backed. The article is also specifically very consequential to readers who are potential policy makers and future decision makers. It gives the learner a chance to change mentality on war against malaria, by promoting a more effective and sustainable solution to the perennial problem.

Peachy Essay and its solid medical science writing help team consist of several medical doctors provides a wide range of academic writing services including:

– Medical science assignment help
– Medical science essay help
– Medical science dissertation help