CIMB Group Malaysia; Financial Analysis
FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS
- Background Summary
CIMB Bank
CIMB is a Malaysian universal bank based in Kuala Lumpur, active in ASEAN’s fast development countries. ASEAN Indian Investment Bank (CIMB Group). CIMB maintains a network of 1,080 branches across the area. This group works in various companies including CIMB Securities International, CIMB Bank, CIMB Islamic, CIMB Niaga and CIMB Thai. Group operations include on consumer banking, wholesale banking, including investment banking and corporate banking, treasury and markets and company strategic and strategic investment. The main markets of the group are Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. In accordance with the group double-bank concept, CIMB Islamic works in parallel with these companies. The Group has more than 40,000 workers in 18 countries encompassing ASEAN and key global financial centres, and nations where its clients have important commercial and investment transactions.
Over the years, CIMB has acquired numerous banks and businesses that supplement the conglomerate with finance services. This comprises GK Goh Securities purchase in 2005, and PT bank Niaga acquisition in 2004. In 1987, CIMB debuted on Bursa Malaysia with market value of RM 35.1 billion as of 30 June 2020. Its listings are lucrative, and the bank produces large profits of up to 340%. CIMB is engaged in ASEAN investment banking and is a significant player in cash stocks and investment in the ASEAN area. With branches in India, Korea, Taiwan, Melbourne, Sydney, London, Hong Kong, and New York, CIMB activities transcend country borders. It is also the leading supplier in the 10 ASEAN nations for digital distributors. CIMB continues to develop and improve its goods and services and is a successful and expanding universal banker. It is a seasoned business consultant for Maybank’s financial services. It also uses the management of assets for its customers (CIMB, 2021).
Maybank
Maybank was set up in 1960 and is the biggest business on the Malaysian stock market by means of market capitalization (Bursa Malaysia). It is rated among the top 500 businesses in the world’s top Forbes Global 2000 corporations. It is one of Malaysia’s leading companies.
A full range of products and services is available to The Maybank Group, including business banking, investment banking, Islamic banking, offshore banking, leasing, and leasing acquisition, insurance, factoring, trustees, asset management, stock trading, invitation services, risk capital & Internet banking.
The goal of Maybank is to humanize financial services throughout Asia, by giving people access to financial services at reasonable prices and always at the center of the community (Maybank, 2021).
- Common size of financial statement analysis
CIMB Bank
CIMB Bank Common Size analysis for Income Statement for year 2017-2019
2019
% |
2018
% |
2017
% |
|
Net Interest income
Net Non-Interest Income Operating Income Overheads Profit before expected credit losses. Expected credit losses on loans, advances, and financing. Expected credit losses written back for commitment and contingencies. Other expected credit losses made. Share of results of joint ventures and associates. Profit before taxation and zakat Net profit attributable to owners of the Parent |
71.13%
28.86% 100% 55.48% 44.52% 9.21%
0.07% 1.98% 0.17% 33.57% 26.13% |
68.48%
31.52% 100% 49.80% 50.20% 8.24%
0.04% 0.77% 0.20% 41.43% 32.13% |
69.26%
30.74% 100% 51.82% 48.18% 12.66%
0.06% 0.99% 0.07% 34.67% 25.39% |
CIMB Bank Common Size analysis for Balance Sheet for year 2017-2019
2019
% |
2018
% |
2017
% |
|
Assets
Cash and short-term funds Deposits and placements with banks and other financial institutions Financial investment portfolio Loans, advances, and financing Other assets (including Intangible assets) |
6.59%
0.84% 19.49% 62.86% 10.22% |
6.65%
0.82% 19.03% 63.13% 10.37% |
8.23%
0.80% 17.96% 62.50% 10.51% |
Total assets | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Liabilities
Deposits from customers Deposits and placements of banks and other financial institutions Other borrowings Bonds, sukuk and debentures Subordinated obligations Other liabilities |
70.07%
4.13% 1.82% 3.18% 2.36% 8.41% |
71.09%
3.79% 1.74% 2.57% 2.52% 8.44% |
70.48%
3.90% 1.99% 2.94% 2.47% 8.38% |
Total liabilities | 89.97% | 90.15% | 90.17% |
Shareholders’ funds | 10.03% | 9.85% | 9.83% |
Total liabilities & Equities | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Maybank
Maybank Common size analysis for Income Statement for year 2017-2019
2019
% |
2018
% |
2017
% |
|
Operating revenue
Interest income Interest expense Net interest income Income from Islamic Banking Scheme operations
Net earned insurance premiums. Other operating income
Net insurance benefits and claims incurred, net fee and commission expenses, change in expense liabilities and taxation of life and takaful fund. Net operating income Overhead expenses Operating profit before impairment losses Allowances for impairment losses on loans, advances, financing and other debts, net (Allowances for)/writeback of impairment losses on financial investments, net Operating profit Share of profits in associates and joint ventures. Profit before taxation and zakat Taxation and zakat |
100
45.62 -22.73 22.89 11.32 34.20 12.79 13.77 60.77
-13.95 46.82 -21.88 24.94
-4.33
-0.07 20.54 0.30 20.84 -4.80 |
100
49.1 -23.50 25.51 11.86 37.37 12.54 10.46 60.37
-10.37 50.00 -23.77 26.24
-3.36
-0.05 22.83 0.21 23.04 -5.38 |
100
48.39 -21.74 26.65 10.75 37.40 11.52 13.22 62.14
-11.09 51.05 -24.92 26.13
-4.30
-0.15 21.68 0.47 22.15 -5.05 |
Profit for the financial year | 16.04 | 17.66 | 17.11 |
Maybank Common size analysis for Balance Sheet for year 2017-2019
2019
% |
2018
% |
2017
% |
|
ASSETS
Cash and short-term funds Deposits and placements with financial institutions Financial assets purchased under resale agreements. Financial assets designated upon initial recognition at fair value through profit or loss. Financial investments at fair value through profit or loss Financial investments at fair value through other comprehensive income Financial investments at amortized cost Loans, advances and financing Derivative assets Reinsurance/retakaful assets and other insurance receivables Other assets Investment properties Statutory deposits with central banks Interest in associates and joint ventures Property, plant and equipment Right-of-use assets Intangible assets Deferred tax assets |
5.57 1.69 1.63
1.72 2.44
14.78 4.17 61.53 1.24
0.51 1.14 0.11 1.80 0.30 0.28 0.19 0.82 0.09 |
6.82 1.55 0.50
1.83 1.88
14.98 3.35 62.84 0.86
0.47 1.22 0.11 2.02 0.29 0.31 – 0.83 0.13 |
6.58 2.22 1.11
– 3.28
14.25 2.64 63.45 0.88
0.51 1.27 0.10 2.01 0.36 0.34 – 0.88 0.11 |
Total assets | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
LIABILITIES
Deposits from customers Investment accounts of customers Deposits and placements from financial institutions Obligations on financial assets sold under repurchase agreements. Derivative liabilities Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss Bills and acceptances payable Insurance/takaful contract liabilities and other insurance payables Other liabilities Recourse obligation on loans and financing sold to Cagamas. Provision for taxation and zakat Deferred tax liabilities Borrowings Subordinated obligations Capital securities. Equity attributable to equity holders of the Bank Share capital Retained profits. Reserves Share premium Shares held-in-trust. Non-controlling interests |
65.26 2.49 5.22
1.68 1.34 0.78 0.15
3.70 2.58
0.18 0.02 0.11 4.95 1.12 0.34
5.79 3.26 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.30 |
66.01 2.92 5.43
1.71 0.99 1.10 0.19
3.33 2.70
0.19 0.05 0.06 3.92 1.33 0.44
5.79 3.22 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.30 |
65.60 3.21 5.57
0.70 0.94 0.83 0.25
3.28 2.51
0.20 0.10 0.10 4.51 1.57 0.82
5.78 3.30 0.48 0.00 -0.02 0.29 |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Common Size Balance Sheet analysis
- At the same time, the CIMB has less inventories than Maybank, yet at the same time it has plenty of cash. This leads to the company’s more current assets than Maybank.
- The CIMB currently has somewhat less equity, which is more debt than Maybank as a fault of its management.
- The CIMB has lower short-run debt than Maybank which includes the loans and loans it borrows. It also has a larger long-term debt proportion than Maybank.
- The CIMB’s share of investments in property, plants and equipment was less significant than in Maybank. While the investment proportion in both partners is equal, the total non-current assets of Maybank are still larger.
Common Size Income Statement Analysis
- In all years, the CIMB is more expensive to make sales than the Maybank. It demonstrates that manufacturing expenses are handled well and have a better gross profit for CIMB all year.
- Sales and distribution expenses, such as Maybank logistics or salaries, are 5.36%, significantly over CIMB, which is only 0.08%. Maybank is 4.61% lower than CIMB administrative costs and 5.65%. Thus, the operational profit % for CIMB is rather greater when all costs are included than for Maybank.
- As you can see, the profit before tax for CIMB is greater than for Maybank in all years. When Maybank’s income tax expenditures are just 2.20 percent and 4.12 percent, the outcome for both will be influenced by net profit and Maybank (17.07 percent) will have a profit net greater than CIMB (12.12 percent).
- Financial Ratios
CIMB Bank
Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current Liabilities
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
Current Assets | 54,171,171 | 48,537,385 | 54,154,158 |
Current Liabilities | 378,744,361 | 396,709,553 | 423,227,251 |
Current Ratio | 0.14 times | 0.12 times | 0.13 times |
The current ratio is too low in most sectors as it approaches 1. In the event that CIMB is barely in a position to pay the obligations due, in three years, the current CIMB ratio is less than 1. A current ratio below 1 does not allow the CIMB to recoup its short-term obligations by having adequate cash in place.
Quick Ratio
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
Quick Assets | 54,171,171 | 48,537,385 | 54,154,158 |
Current Liabilities | 378,744,361 | 396,709,553 | 423,227,251 |
Quick Ratio | 0.14 times | 0.12 times | 0.13 times |
The result is 1 is considered the typical quick ratio in the three years between 2017 and 2019. It shows that the business is fully prepared with sufficient assets to meet its existing obligations instantly. A business with a fast-to-face ratio of less than 1 may not be able to completely disburse its existing obligations in the near future, while a company with a rapid ratio of less than 1. For example, a fast ratio of 1.5 implies that a firm is equipped with 1.50 liquid assets to cover 1 of its current obligations.
Networking capital
Networking Capital = Current Assets-Current Liabilities
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
Current Assets | 54,171,171 | 48,537,385 | 54,154,158 |
Current Liabilities | 378,744,361 | 396,709,553 | 423,227,251 |
Networking Capital | (RM324,573,190) | (RM348,172,168) | (RM369,073,093) |
Negative working capital occurs when a business exceeds its current obligations. This implies that obligations payable within one year are greater than existing monetizable assets during the same time period. A purchaser generally sees negative working equity as a harmful goal, since it means extra equity must be operated by the company following closure. In fact, a buyer wants a working capital ratio between 1 and 1.5 times, which implies that for every RM of current obligations, at least one RM of current assets is available. That ensures that the buyer can produce enough cash for the supplier and payroll obligations in the near run.
Account Receivable Turnover Ratio
Receivable Turnover Ratio = Sales/Avg. Account Receivable
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
Sales | 17,626,496 | 17,381,968 | 17,795,879 |
Avg A/c Receivable | 37,846,904.5 | 38,903,541 | 40,987,500 |
Receivable Turnover Ratio | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.43 |
The ratio dropped between 2017 and 2019. The number of occurrences in the year 2017 was 0.47, in 2018 it was 0.45, and in 2019 it was 0.43. In conclusion, the business has a lower relationship, meaning that its credit rules should be re-evaluated to guarantee that the credit that the company receives does not accrue interest and is collected promptly.
Debt Ratio
Debt Ratio = Total Liabilities/Total assets
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
Total Liabilities | 456,693,097 | 481,501,072 | 515,776,579 |
Total Assets | 506,499,532 | 534,089,043 | 573,245,655 |
Debt Ratio | 90.16% | 90.15% | 89.97% |
The CIMB Bank debt ratio is the top of 3 years at 90,16 percent in 2017, but still maintains the debt ratio of 90 percent between 2017 and 2018. The debt ratio fell to 89.97% in 2019, with the overall asset growth. As the debt ratio increases, the greater the corporate risk. To prevent the risk result, the firm has to maintain a constant or reduced debt ratio, because it has the high ratio.
Debt Equity Ratio
Debt Equity = Total liabilities/Total equities
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
Total Liabilities | 456,693,097 | 481,501,072 | 515,776,579 |
Total equity | 49,806,435 | 52,587,971 | 57,469,076 |
Debt Equity | 9.16 | 9.15 | 8.97 |
The quantity of debt used in relation to the capital supplied by the business in respect of CIMB Bank equity debt is very hazardous because of its 9.92-equity ratio and its lowest in 2019 at 8.97. The bank’s bankruptcy risk was greatest in 2017, with a ratio of 9.16 being much too high, but the ratio remains below 8.97 in 2019.
Net Profit Margin
Net Profit Margin = Net Profit after taxes/Net Sales*100
2017(RM in Million) | 2018(RM in Million) | 2019(RM in Million) | |
Net Profit | 6,109 | 4,884 | 3,913 |
Net Sales | 17,626 | 16,065 | 15,395 |
Net Profit Margin % | 34.65% | 30.40% | 25.42% |
In 2017, the proportion rose by 34.65%. In 2018 the proportion dropped to 30,40% and fell to 25,42% in 2019. The trend has already dropped till 2019 from 2017 to 2019. The business is therefore still able to manage its net sales to make good profit of its assets in terms of sales, assets, operational costs and equity for 2017 to 2019.
Maybank Ratios
Current Ratio
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
Current Assets | 81,019,304 | 88,600,804 | 88,889,122 |
Current Liabilities | 354,800,054 | 270,633,207 | 261,777,965 |
Current Ratio | 0.23 times | 0.33 times | 0.34 times |
The current ratio is too low in most sectors as it approaches 1. At this stage when the obligations owing to the debt can hardly be met by Maybank. The current Maybank Berhad ratio indicates in three years that the current ratio is less than 1. With an actual ratio below 1 the liquid assets of Maybank do not suffice to repay their short-term obligations.
Quick Ratio
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
Quick Assets | 81,019,304 | 88,600,804 | 88,889,122 |
Current Liabilities | 354,800,054 | 270,633,207 | 261,777,965 |
Quick Ratio | 0.23 times | 0.33 times | 0.34 times |
The result 1 is considered the normal quick ratio in three years between 2017 and 2019. It shows that the business is fully prepared with sufficient assets to fulfil its existing obligations instantaneously. A business with a fast-to-face ratio of less than 1 may not be able to completely disburse its existing obligations in the near future, while a company with a rapid ratio of less than 1. For example, a fast ratio of 1.5 implies that a firm is equipped with 1.50 liquid assets to cover 1 of its current obligations.
Networking capital
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
Current Assets | 81,019,304 | 88,600,804 | 88,889,122 |
Current Liabilities | 354,800,054 | 270,633,207 | 261,777,965 |
Networking Capital | (RM273,780,750) | (RM182,032,404) | (RM172,888,843) |
The negative work capital occurs when a business exceeds its current obligations. This implies that obligations payable within one year are greater than existing monetizable assets during the same time period. A purchaser generally sees negative working equities as harmful in a goal, since it means extra equity must be operated by the company following closure. In fact, a buyer wants a working capital ratio between 1 and 1.5 times, which implies that for every RM of current obligations, at least one RM of current assets is available. That ensures that the buyer can produce enough cash for the supplier and payroll obligations in the near run.
Account Receivable Turnover Ratio
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
Sales | 45,580,310,000 | 47,319,853,000 | 52,844,964,000 |
Avg A/c Receivable | 656,581,847,000 | 694,215,282,500 | 730,441,250,500 |
Receivable Turnover Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
The accounting turnover ratio is a ratio of efficiency and is an indication of the financial and operational success of the business. A high ratio is beneficial since it shows the efficiency of the company’s receivables collection. A high turnover in accounts payable also shows that it has a high-quality client base capable of rapidly paying its obligations. A high ratio may also indicate that the business has a cautious lending strategy. A low accounting turnover ratio, on the other hand, shows that the business is bad in collecting. The business may be responsible for extending its credit conditions to clients who are non-creditable and who face financial problems. It is nevertheless important to compare the relationship of a business in its Maybank to that of its rivals or comparable companies. If a business ratio is considered in relation to comparable companies, the company’s performance will be analyzed more meaningfully than an abstractive calculation. For example, if the average ratio of its Maybank is two, a business with a four-to-one ratio rather than a “high” figure would seem to be much superior.
Debt Ratio
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
Total Liabilities | 447,414,273 | 391,024,031 | 394,296,969 |
Total Assets | 509,666,821 | 456,613,298 | 456,613,298 |
Debt Ratio | 87.79% | 85.64% | 84.92% |
Debt Ratio for Maybank in 2017 are the highest with 87.79%% ratio and the lowest ratio is in 2019 with 84.92%. The ratio did not have too much changed in ratio but the debt ratio still higher and can risk the company. The percentage of debt ratio keep decreasing and it reduce the risk of the company every year.
Debt equity Ratio
2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
Total Liabilities | 447,414,273 | 391,024,031 | 394,296,969 |
Total Assets | 62,252,548 | 65,589,267 | 70,063,377 |
Debt Ratio | 7.18% | 5.96% | 5.62% |
Debt of Equity of Maybank in 2017 are highest ratio with 7.18 and in 2019 are the lowest with 5.62. Maybank have the higher risk because of the ratio are too high with 7.18. However, the ratio keeps decreasing until 2019 to 5.62. The ratio decreases because the total equity keeps increasing by year until 2019 and the highest equity and the liabilities keep decrease until 2018 and increase in 2019 but the ratio still lower than before and it can reduce the risk.
Net Profit Margin
2017(RM in Million) | 2018(RM in Million) | 2019(RM in Million) | |
Net Profit | 10,098 | 10,901 | 11014 |
Net Sales | 45,580 | 47,320 | 52845 |
Net Profit Margin % | 22.15% | 23.04% | 20.84% |
In 2018 the percentage rose to 23.04% and decrease into 20.84% on 2019. From 2017 until 2019 already showed that the trend rose within year by year until 2019. Thus, the company is still able to manage net sales achieved to utilize its assets well to generate profit relative to revenue, assets, operating cost, and shareholders’ equity during 2017 until 2019.
- Discuss and highlights the issues of each company for the period 2017-2019 and relate to company performance and might give the appropriate suggestions on the companies’ issues and performance
Maybank Berhad’s current ratio is superior to Berhad’s current one. For Maybank Berhad, the current ratio is 0.27 times greater than 0.13 times the current CIMB Berhad ratio. The current ratio of both businesses is lower than 1. The two businesses are thus unable to meet their existing obligations.
Maybank Berhad’s quick ratio is greater than that of CIMB Berhad, since the quick ratio is larger for Maybank Berhad than for CIMB Berhad. The ratio is 0.27 times for Maybank Berhad, and 0.13 times for CIMB Berhad. Since the ratio is below 1 quickly, the present obligations of Maybank and CIMB cannot be paid quickly.
Maybank has a debt ratio of 84.92% and 89.97% for CIMB bank. The debt rate for Maybank is better than for CIMB because the greater the debt rate, the lower the business risk, and the lower the Maybank relationship between Maybank and CIMB in 2019. The lower the risk.
Equity Maybank’s debt is 5.62 and CMB Bank is 8.97 debt-to-equity. Maybank’s debt to equity is better than CIMB’s equity debt. More equity debt and greater risk for businesses. The smaller the amount of debt, the better for the enterprise. CIMB is riskier since CIMB’s equity debt is greater than Maybank.
CIMB Group Holdings Berhad’s net income margin is better than Maybank’s net income margin. CIMB Group Holding Brahad’s net profit margin is 25.42%, while Maybank’s net profit margin is 20.84%. As the profit margin rises, the better the profit generated by the business. As the CIMB Group’s net profit margin is greater than that of Maybank, Berhad is therefore stronger at achieving net profit than the Maybank Group. This indicates that Berhad showed excellent performance for CIMB Group, whereas Maybank exhibited poor performance.
Recommendations
Berhad CIMB Group Holding must subject itself to the risk of credit. To achieve the goal, the CIMB Group may reinforce and enhance the status of its clients’ loans. For example, CIMB Group should explicitly examine the financial statements of the client before providing a loan to a customer. CIMB Group may examine clients’ financial statements and identify customer problems and prevent risks. CIMB Group should also provide its employees with training. The training should include instruction on how employees monitor and respond to a client who does not repay the loan on time. It helps the business to minimize load offs and losses using this training. If any issue has occurred that cannot be avoided, the CIMB Group may compensate for damages via credit insurance.
We believe Maybank does as well as we do now. This is shown every year through their accomplishments and accolades. Our aim is to keep them firm to ensure that they are a successful bank in Malaysia. What we can offer is Based on our findings, financial goods, and services such as commercial and offshore banking, offshore trust services, general insurance, Islamic banking, investment banking, and unit trust management are among the strengths they should continue to retain. This is a whole range of goods and services and is what makes Maybank so handy for its consumers. We are certain that in Malaysia they may be the number one financial institution if Maybank succeeds in preserving and enhancing these kinds of goods and services. And they should not only become ASEAN’s top financial company, but also. They may also enhance their online banking services in order to offer better services. Online banking is becoming popular since it may save a great deal of time. There is no need for it at the bank and the processing time is quicker. We may do it wherever and whenever we want by utilizing online banking services, as long as there is internet connectivity. We now perceive that, as a customer, Maybank is not doing well in the area of online banking, particularly in its app, where it is not user-friendly. Maybank should focus on this subject if it wants to remain relevant in the market.
On the basis of our research, we know that it will lead to a big issue with a large liquidity risk. CIMB Group Holding Berhad should thus manage its assets as much as possible to minimize liquidity risk. To this end, the CIMB Group may maintain the risk-weighted capital ratio or persist in raising it. The business may do more operations with big cash via a high risk-weighted capital ratio. CIMB Organization Berhad may attempt to come up with a small group to deal with the company’s liquidity alone. CIMB Group would thus be useful to know more about its liquidity situation. In addition, holding too much risky property may increase the risk of liquidity. Thus, the CIMB Group should minimize risks to prevent losses and funds being stuck. Keeping a strong connection with other rivals also avoids risks. CIMB Group and Maybank, for example, have an excellent connection. Maybank may want to assist CIMB to fix the issue if anything goes wrong for the CIMB Group.
CIMB Group Holding Berhad must do a market study to learn about market trends and the reasons for fraud that may influence the market pricing conditions. The CIMB Group can thus respond quicker to market capture. The CIMB Group has to be aware of economic developments or events that may affect the market due to the risk of interest rates. This helps the CIMB Group prevent a catastrophic scenario owing to interest rate fluctuations.
Operational risk is a bad situation which many companies are experiencing. CIMB Group Holding Berhad, and Maybank must provide training for their employees in order to prevent this type of issue. Through training, their employees may fully grasp CIMB Group’s operational systems. Human errors may thus be minimized. The qualified staff can administer the information and networking systems. This is because qualified employees have the opportunity to solve any problems in the data and networking systems and prevent massive losses. In addition, from time to time, the ATM should always perform appropriate maintenance on the machine. It is necessary to avoid mistakes, and if the ATM maker has broken, it can fix it in time.
- Perform a comparative analysis for both companies’ performance and give a conclusion of this case study analysis.
CIMB Bank
CIMB Bank Comparative analysis for Income Statement for year 2017-2019
2018
% |
2017
% |
|
Net Interest income
Net Non-Interest Income Operating Income Overheads Profit before expected credit losses. Expected credit losses on loans, advances, and financing. Expected credit losses written back for commitment and contingencies. Other expected credit losses made. Share of results of joint ventures and associates. Profit before taxation and zakat Net profit attributable to owners of the Parent |
6.3%
-6.2% 2.4% 14.1% -9.2% 14.5%
71.4% 162.7% -8.8% -17.0% -18.3% |
-2.5%
1.1% -1.4% -5.2% 2.7% -35.8%
-30.0% -23.4% 161.5% 17.9% 24.8% |
CIMB Bank Comparative analysis for Balance Sheet for year 2017-2019
2018
% |
2017
% |
|
Assets
Cash and short-term funds Deposits and placements with banks and other financial institutions Financial investment portfolio Loans, advances, and financing Other assets (including intangible assets) |
6.3%
9.7% 9.9% 6.9% 5.85 |
-14.7%
7.9% 11.7% 6.5% 4.1% |
Total assets | 7.35 | 5.4% |
Liabilities
Deposits from customers Deposits and placements of banks and other financial institutions Other borrowings Bonds, sukuk and debentures Subordinated obligations Other liabilities |
5.8%
17.0% 12.4% 32.9% 0.3% 6.9% |
6.4%
2.4% -7.5% -7.9% 7.6% 6.2% |
Total liabilities | 7.1% | 5.4% |
Maybank
Maybank Comparative analysis for Income Statement for year 2017-2019
2018
% |
2017
% |
|
Operating revenue
Interest income Interest expense Net interest income Dividends from subsidiaries and associates Other operating income Net operating income Overhead expenses Operating profit before impairment losses Allowances for impairment losses on loans, advances, financing and other debts, net Writeback of/(allowances for) impairment losses on financial investments net (Allowances for)/writeback of impairment losses on financial investments net Operating profit Profit before taxation and zakat Taxation and zakat |
0.84
-7.83 -3.96 -1164 52.40 -5.44 0.04 -13.52 8.34
156.96
-164.94
-162.50 -3.81 -3.81 -21.14 |
7.41
8.49 18.57 0.13 24.67 11.34 6.27 -1.28 11.48
-37.26
-933.29
– 18.98 18.98 17.15 |
Profit for the financial year | -0.39 | 19.35 |
Maybank Comparative analysis for Balance Sheet for year 2017-2019
2018
% |
2017
% |
|
ASSETS
Cash and short-term funds Deposits and placements with financial institutions Financial assets purchased under resale agreements. Financial investments at fair value through profit or loss Financial investments at fair value through other comprehensive income Financial investments at amortized cost Loans, advances and financing Loans, advances and financing to customers Derivative assets Other assets Statutory deposits with central banks Investment in subsidiaries Interest in associates and joint ventures Property, plant and equipment Intangible assets Deferred tax assets |
19.30 20.80 19.09 44.85
98.06 42.52 13.77 -2.87 47.11 -61.53 -18.66 -3.59 -66.28 -26.07 -7.48 -1.00 |
-12.27 9.48 -50.70 12.89
– – -94.14 – -0.96 9.70 -34.92 42.57 0.00 -10.68 -36.47 9.58 |
Total assets | 1.70 | -10.41 |
LIABILITIES
Deposits from customers Investment accounts of customers Deposits and placements from financial institutions Obligations on financial assets sold under repurchase agreements. Derivative liabilities Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss Bills and acceptances payable Other liabilities Recourse obligation on loans and financing sold to Cagamas. Provision for taxation and zakat Borrowings Subordinated obligations Capital securities. Total Liabilities Equity attributable to equity holders of the Bank Share capital Retained profits. Reserves Share premium Share held-in-trust Non-controlling interests |
-4.86 – -3.00
33.04 42.33 -23.23 -21.75 8.33
-1.36 -100.00 39.26 -0.01 -19.93 0.84
3.28 5.70 47.75 – – – |
22.43 – 40.63
309.81 3.61 55.15 -55.74 -56.59
0.24 -79.32 -13.52 -2.19 -43.81 -12.60
5.64 6.11 -3.76 – -100.00 – |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | 1.70 | -10.41 |
Conclusion
Finally, we can observe that both Maybank and CIMB have a very good company performance and a brilliant future in the service field. Since Maybank is, nevertheless, one of Malaysia’s oldest banks and Malaysia’s first bank, Maybank seems to have done a decent and better job than the bank CIMB. Today, both Maybank and CIMB are major banks that provide different types of Islamic and conventional goods in Malaysia. We personally think they can develop better, produce more Islamic goods, and ultimately become Asia Pacific’s major financial institution that provides customers with more Islamic items.
Appendix
CIMB BANK FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MAYBANK FINANCIAL STATEMENTS